C01 · Core course

Understanding the IMO Regulatory System for Executives

When a maritime requirement comes up, a manager needs to know exactly which instrument and which authority it rests on.

  • 8 saat
  • 4 120-minute sessions
  • Persian or English · in person or online

The management problem

Confusion about the competence of IMO, ILO and national authorities, and mixing binding requirements with guidance.

Audience: Leaders of maritime administrations, ports and shipping companies, and senior managers without a legal background

Course aim: Map regulatory decision-making and separate the responsibilities of international and national bodies

Key questions

  • How do we distinguish the roles of IMO, ILO and the Member State?
  • Is every IMO resolution or guideline binding on our organisation?
  • How do we report a regulatory change to the board as a short decision?

Measurable learning outcomes

By the end of the course, participants will be able to:

  1. Identify the correct authority and instrument for three organisational issues
  2. Classify, with reasons, whether an instrument is binding and whom it covers
  3. Prepare a one-page map of issue, source, national owner and proposed action

Sessions

  1. C01-S01 · 2 hours

    The legal and institutional structure of the maritime sector

    IMO, ILO, the Member State and the national maritime administration; the limits of each body's competence

    Assessed output: Identify the responsible body for three hypothetical issues

  2. C01-S02 · 2 hours

    IMO committees and the path to a decision

    Assembly, Council, MSC, MEPC, LEG, FAL; the III and HTW Sub-Committees

    Assessed output: A diagram of how an issue is adopted and followed up

  3. C01-S03 · 2 hours

    International instruments and their legal standing

    Convention, code, resolution, circular and guidance; an overview of SOLAS, MARPOL, STCW and FAL

    Assessed output: A table classifying instruments and responsibilities

  4. C01-S04 · 2 hours

    Regulatory intelligence and reporting to the board

    Tracking regulatory change, entry into force, implementation owners, timing and risk

    Assessed output: A one-page executive summary

Core scenario (fictional, for training only)

The maritime administration of the fictional State of Aban receives three letters at once: on seafarer certificates, the maritime single window and crew working conditions. Participants must identify the authority, the instrument and the national decision point for each.

Final project

A one-page map of regulatory sources and management decisions

Criteria: precise identification of the problem and sources, clear reasoning, organisational accountability, prioritised actions, stated limitations and readiness for presentation to a decision-maker.

Method and assessment

Analysis of three management problems, classification of instruments and a regulatory report to the board. Interactive teaching, case analysis, group work and trainer feedback.

Short test 20%, session exercises 40% and final project 40%. The suggested criterion for an internal certificate of completion is at least 80% attendance and a score of 70 out of 100; this is not an official IMO or STCW standard.

Official sources

The course builds regulatory literacy for managers. Its analysis does not replace a State's official legal interpretation or the competence of a certifying authority.

Gizli görüşme

Design a programme for your organisation

Request this course on its own or as part of a learning path.

Çalıştay talep edin

Her görüşme gizli kalır · +98 912 933 2824

WhatsApp