Training and Competence Development

Quality assurance in maritime executive training: from syllabus to competence that can be assessed

Aligning learning goals, learning experience and assessment is what separates specialist courses from mere lectures.

This article is shown in English. Encyclopedia articles are currently written in English and Persian.

What change is a course supposed to make?

A maritime management and governance programme is valuable when, after the course, a manager can analyse a real problem, assess the options and produce an output for decision-making. Showing slides or counting attendance hours is not evidence that learning has happened. Design based on constructive alignment links three components: the learning outcome, the learning activity and the method of assessment.

Figure 11Four phases of constructive alignment: learning outcomes, aligned teaching activities, defensible assessment and institutional quality assurance.

Observable outputs

For example, in training on the III Code a suitable output is a “gap matrix and roadmap”; in port governance, a “map of decision rights and KPIs”; and in negotiation, a “delegation briefing book”. Assessment should check whether participants can really produce and defend these documents. Bloom’s taxonomy helps in designing objectives that go beyond memorising information.

Quality control of sources

Every training pack should have a reference and version, a source document, a legal status, a review date and an academic owner. In regulatory subjects, distinguishing a binding decision from recommended guidance is part of training quality. A hypothetical case study must also be clearly labelled as hypothetical so that it is not mistaken for a real case.

The framework of the full programme

In the training documents provided, a structure of 12 courses and 56 sessions, 112 hours in total has been designed. This structure is for executive training and should not be confused with a seafarer’s certificate of competency or a course officially approved by IMO. It is suggested that each course include a decision-based project and peer review as well as a knowledge test.

Practical checklist

  • Define measurable learning outcomes
  • Link exercises and assessment to the outcome
  • Record the version and official source of every lesson pack
  • Do not claim official IMO approval for a management programme

Frequently asked questions

Does this programme replace statutory STCW training?

No. A programme in management and governance training does not replace seafarers' professional competence training.

Editorial note: this article is written for awareness and management decision-making. Applying any rule depends on the authentic current text, the legal position of the State concerned and the facts of the case. The content is independent and implies no endorsement by, or affiliation with, IMO.

Sources

  1. IMO — STCW Convention 1978, as amended
  2. International Maritime Organization — Training and Certification
  3. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. — Teaching for Quality Learning at University

保密沟通

预约咨询

一起探讨这对贵机构意味着什么。

预约咨询

所有沟通均严格保密 · +98 912 933 2824

WhatsApp